diff options
author | camthesaxman <camthesaxman@users.noreply.github.com> | 2020-01-29 18:17:43 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | camthesaxman <camthesaxman@users.noreply.github.com> | 2020-01-29 18:17:43 -0600 |
commit | cdc6e2c50f96119bdc4c1205ff5901ca82ec8357 (patch) | |
tree | 3e9217eabcf444e166008411f445315606dded59 /gcc_arm/testsuite/gcc.wendy/gnu24.c | |
parent | 27176890c4a688ea7de44d3f55af32827016a9fd (diff) |
add old compiler with ARM support
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc_arm/testsuite/gcc.wendy/gnu24.c')
-rwxr-xr-x | gcc_arm/testsuite/gcc.wendy/gnu24.c | 32 |
1 files changed, 32 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc_arm/testsuite/gcc.wendy/gnu24.c b/gcc_arm/testsuite/gcc.wendy/gnu24.c new file mode 100755 index 0000000..71bb3cc --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc_arm/testsuite/gcc.wendy/gnu24.c @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +/* From Sun-Spots v6n12 +Date: 26 Jan 88 15:58:58 CST (Tue) +From: uunet!mcrware!jejones@ut-sally.UUCP +Subject: ?: vs. pointer to function "returning" void + +I find that on a Sun 3, the C compiler complains about code of the following +form with a message "operands of : have incompatible types." I don't think +this is correct, because woof1 and woof2 are both pointers to functions +"returning" void, so that (pointer to function returning void) should be +the type of the actual parameter. Right? + +Have other people seen this problem? Is it, if it is indeed a problem +with the Sun C compiler, fixed in some release? + + James Jones +*/ + +void woof1() {}; +void woof2() {}; + +main(i, argv) +int i; +char **argv; +{ + bletch(i ? woof1 : woof2); + printf("Test passed (if it compiled at all)\n"); +} + +bletch(x) + void (*x)(); +{ +} |