summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900321_01.C
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900321_01.C')
-rwxr-xr-xgcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900321_01.C29
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900321_01.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900321_01.C
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..489671f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900321_01.C
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+// g++ 1.37.1 bug 900321_01
+
+// cfront flags ERRORs on each of the lines indicated below. g++ does not
+// flag either ERRORs or warnings.
+
+// Although I cannot find where in the current C++ Reference Manual this
+// topic is covered, I am sure that these statements should get ERRORs in
+// a "strongly typed" language.
+
+// Cfront 2.0 passes this test.
+
+// keywords: array types, array bound, pointers
+
+int (*ptr_to_array_of_ints)[];
+int (*ptr_to_array_of_3_ints) [3];
+int (*ptr_to_array_of_5_ints) [5];
+
+void function_0 ()
+{
+ // we miss the first two because typeck.c (comp_array_types) deems
+ // it okay if one of the sizes is null
+ ptr_to_array_of_ints = ptr_to_array_of_3_ints; // ERROR -
+ ptr_to_array_of_3_ints = ptr_to_array_of_ints; // ERROR -
+
+ ptr_to_array_of_3_ints = ptr_to_array_of_5_ints; // ERROR -
+ ptr_to_array_of_5_ints = ptr_to_array_of_3_ints; // ERROR -
+}
+
+int main () { return 0; }