1 files changed, 0 insertions, 69 deletions
diff --git a/gcc_arm/testsuite/gcc.wendy/gnu20.c b/gcc_arm/testsuite/gcc.wendy/gnu20.c
deleted file mode 100755
index 5c02677..0000000
--- a/gcc_arm/testsuite/gcc.wendy/gnu20.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,69 +0,0 @@
-/*
-Return-Path: <ucsfcgl!reagan.ai.mit.edu!RUTGERS.EDU!RUTGERS.EDU!uiucdcs!uiucuxc!sys1!sneaky!gordon>
-Date: Tue Dec 15, 1987 at 10:25:42 cst
-From: uiucdcs!uiucuxc!sys1!sneaky!gordon@rutgers.edu (Gordon Burditt)
-Message-Id: <8712151625.AA15898@sneaky.UUCP>
-To: uiucdcs!uiucuxc!sys1!techsup!vaxnix!ron@rutgers.edu,
-        bug-gcc@prep.ai.mit.edu
-Subject: gcc bug
-Sent: Tue Dec 15, 1987 at 10:25:42 cst
-
-I have been asked to pass along this bug report for gcc 1.15.
-I am having trouble figuring out from the ANSI spec whether this really
-is a bug or not.  ANSI says that side effects caused by function argument
-evaluation must be complete by the time the call is done, but how about side 
-effects in evaluating the function address?
-
-From: ron@vaxnix.tandy.COM (Ron Light)
-Date: Sat, 12 Dec 87 7:50:53 CST
-*/
-
-typedef int (*Inst)();		/* machine instruction */
-#define STOP (Inst)(0)
-
-Inst *pc;			/* program counter during execution */
-
-execute(p)			/* run the machine */
-Inst *p;
-{
-	for(pc = p; *pc != STOP;)
-		(*(*pc++))();
-}
-
-int inst();
-Inst instrs[] = {inst, inst, inst, STOP};
-int inst() {
-	if (pc == &instrs[1])
-		printf("Test passed\n");
-	else
-		printf("FAILED, pc = %x, instrs = %x\n", pc, instrs);
-	exit(0);
-}
-main()
-{
-
-	execute(instrs);
-}
-/*
-code produced by gcc:
-.text
-	.even
-.globl _execute
-_execute:
-	link a6,#0
-	movl a6@(8),_pc
-	jra L2
-L5:
-	movl _pc,a0
-	movl a0@,a0        ;<---------------------------+
-	jbsr a0@           ;                            |
-	addql #4,_pc       ; This should be here--------+
-L2:
-	movl _pc,a0
-	tstl a0@
-	jne L5
-	unlk a6
-	rts
-.comm _pc,4
-
-*/