1 files changed, 0 insertions, 83 deletions
diff --git a/gcc_arm/testsuite/gcc.wendy/gnu30.c b/gcc_arm/testsuite/gcc.wendy/gnu30.c
deleted file mode 100755
index a032e5f..0000000
--- a/gcc_arm/testsuite/gcc.wendy/gnu30.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,83 +0,0 @@
-/*
-Message-Id: <8901111052.AA21004@hop.toad.com>
-To: rms
-Cc: gnu
-Subject: gcc-1.32 sparc bug: uses invalid addressing mode
-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 89 02:52:19 -0800
-From: gnu
-
-The following program crashes because
-
-	sth	...,[_foo]
-
-is not valid, since it only has a few displacement bits but needs to represent
-a 32-bit address.  Unfortunately the Sun assembler does not catch this at
-assembly time, nor does the linker complain.
-
-This is excerpted from gnuchess.
-
-I tried to track it down myself; things are OK through the lreg pass,
-which marks this pseudo-reg as live in "-1" instrs, indicating that
-it is infrequently used and should not get a register.  Greg deletes
-the instruction that loads it, and substitutes the name _Developed
-for the pseudo-reg, apparently not realizing that this is invalid.
-
-	John
-
-[In gcc-1.33 prototype, this coredumps cc1 in 
-#0  0x77978 in next_insn_tests_no_inequality (insn=(rtx) 0xa6750) (recog.c line 97)
-#1  0x60858 in subst (x=(rtx) 0xa66a0, to=(rtx) 0xa6630, from=(rtx) 0xa6628) (combine.c line 1063)
-#2  0x5fd44 in subst (x=(rtx) 0xa6728, to=(rtx) 0xa6630, from=(rtx) 0xa6628) (combine.c line 852)
-#3  0x5fd44 in subst (x=(rtx) 0xa6880, to=(rtx) 0xa6630, from=(rtx) 0xa6628) (combine.c line 852)
-#4  0x5fd44 in subst (x=(rtx) 0xa6740, to=(rtx) 0xa6630, from=(rtx) 0xa6628) (combine.c line 852)
-#5  0x5f3c0 in try_combine (i3=(rtx) 0xa6750, i1=(rtx) 0xa6648, i2=(rtx) 0xa66c0) (combine.c line 521)
-#6  0x5eb58 in combine_instructions (f=(rtx) 0xa6828, nregs=276) (combine.c line 272)
-#7  0x1ad1c in rest_of_compilation (decl=(tree) 0xa8cf0) (toplev.c line 1357)
-#8  0x10cb8 in finish_function () (c-decl.c line 3507)
-#9  0x5d7c in yyparse () (c-parse.y line 244)
-#10 0x19ed8 in compile_file (name=(char *) 0xf7fffa67 "foo.c") (toplev.c line 966)
-#11 0x1bbb4 in main (argv=(char **) 0xf7fff98c, argc=5) (toplev.c line 1709)
-
-(gdb) p *insn
-$1 = {code = INSN, mode = VOIDmode, jump = 0, call = 0, unchanging = 0, volatil = 0, in_struct = 0, used = 0, integrated = 0, fld = {{rtint = 8, rtstr = 0x8 <Address 0x8 out of bounds>, rtx = 0x8, rtvec = 0x8, rttype = SFmode}}}
-(gdb) 
-
-I am wondering why "nregs" in combine_instructions (#6) is so high on such a
-small program.  This may have nothing to do with the bug.
-
-	John
-]
-
-*/
-
-
-short board[64];
-short Developed[1];
-
-ExaminePosition()
-{
-    Developed[0] = board[0] != 2;
-}
-
-
-
-/* main() added for test purposes. */
-main()
-{
-	int fail = 0;
-
-	board[0] = 5;
-	ExaminePosition();
-	if (Developed[0] != 1) {
-		printf("Test #1 failed, Developed[0] = %d\n", Developed[0]);
-		fail++;
-	}
-	board[0] = 2;
-	ExaminePosition();
-	if (Developed[0] != 0) {
-		printf("Test #2 failed, Developed[0] = %d\n", Developed[0]);
-		fail++;
-	}
-	if (fail == 0)
-		printf("Test passed\n");
-}